Mellencamp Is Right, Brand-Supported Piracy Screws Songwriters AGAIN: Snakes in the Grass, @McDonalds, Google and Other Species of Vermin

Music Technology Policy

John Mellencamp summed it up nicely in his recent post : [O]n top of everything, [piracy sites are] collecting advertising money from Madison Avenue. The Mad Mad World of Ad Supported Piracy: The Unhappy Meal Served Up to Artists by McDonald’s, Macy’s, Google and Levi’s.

What the FTC Should Know About Brand Sponsored Piracy and Google’s “Pinto Problem”

Music Technology Policy

The Los Angeles Times published yesterday a story about the USC-Annenberg Innovation Lab first monthly report on brand sponsored piracy–the purchase by major brands of advertising inventory located on pirate websites. artist rights brand sponsored piracy Jonathan Taplin USC Annenberg

Trending Sources

A New Meaning for Real Time Bidding: An artist’s guide to how the brands and ad agencies are in on advertising supported piracy

Music Technology Policy

Imagine video on whatever screen supported by ads delivered with this technology…” Right. This is why the screen shots are so important–when provided a screen capture of their ad on a pirate network, the brand cannot deny knowledge.

Way Past the Creepy Line: The Infringement for Profit DMCA License Meets the War on Terror

Music Technology Policy

” And you’ll notice from the screen capture above, one of those “reputable companies” is Google itself. The Daily Mail has a fascinating article today “ Google Cashes in on Hate Videos: Ads for Reputable Companies Featured Alongside Terror Videos.”

Chiat Day’s Confusing Messaging in Times Square Continues

Music Technology Policy

So…another day brings more confusion in the world of “PIRACY IS PROGRESS” or “ARTISTS VS. ARTISTS” or whatever this thing is titled. But–take a look at this screen capture from the news section of Little Black Book (which is where all this started).